Marvin Minsky Quotes
-
There are three basic approaches to AI: Case-based, rule-based, and connectionist reasoning.
-
Once the computers got control, we might never get it back. We would survive at their sufferance. If we're lucky, they might decide to keep us as pets.
-
Most adults have some childlike fascination for making and arranging larger structures out of smaller ones.
-
One's present personality cannot share all the thoughts of one's older personalities - and yet it has some sense that they exist. This is one reason why we feel that we possess an inner Self - a sort of ever-present person-friend, inside the mind, whom we can always ask for help.
-
This is a tricky domain because, unlike simple arithmetic, to solve a calculus problem - and in particular to perform integration - you have to be smart about which integration technique should be used: integration by partial fractions, integration by parts, and so on.
-
When David Marr at MIT moved into computer vision, he generated a lot of excitement, but he hit up against the problem of knowledge representation; he had no good representations for knowledge in his vision systems.
-
Theorems often tell us complex truths about the simple things, but only rarely tell us simple truths about the complex ones. To believe otherwise is wishful thinking or 'mathematics envy.'
-
Changing the states of many agents grossly alters behavior, while changing only a few just perturbs the overall disposition a little.
-
For avoiding nonsense in general, we might accumulate millions of censors. For all we know, this 'negative meta-knowledge' - about patterns of thought and inference that have been found defective or harmful - may be a large portion of all we know.
-
How many processes are going on, to keep that teacup level in your grasp? There must be a hundred of them.
-
An ethicist is someone who sees something wrong with whatever you have in mind.
-
We find things that do not fit into familiar frameworks hard to understand – such things seem meaningless.
-
Every system that we build will surprise us with new kinds of flaws until those machines become clever enough to conceal their faults from us.
-
Questioning one's own 'top-level' goals always reveals the paradox-oscillation of ultimate purpose. How could one decide that a goal is worthwhile - unless one already knew what it is that is worthwhile?