-
Land, in England, is valuable, because we have highly-paid artisans to consume the produce on the spot.
-
I maintain that the existing corn laws are bad, because they have given a monopoly of food to the landed interest over every other class and over every other interest in the kingdom.
-
Worse there cannot be; a better, I believe, there may be, by giving energy to the capital and skill of the country to produce exports, by increasing which, alone, can we flatter ourselves with the prospect of finding employment for that part of our population now unemployed.
-
So that a famine price is vague, and the plan subject to all the inconvenience now experienced.
-
Our people are unemployed and anxious to work for the food which foreigners can give us.
-
I am willing to admit that if the agriculturists are oppressed by peculiar burdens, they ought to be relieved from them, or be allowed a fair and just protection equivalent to all such peculiar burdens.
-
Now, what produces a want of demand? A refusal to take from other countries the commodities which they produce.
-
Destroy or take away the employment and wages of those artisans - which the corn laws in a great measure do - and you will, ere long, render the land in Great Britain of as little value as it is in other countries.