Alexander Stepanov Quotes
I find OOP methodologically wrong. It starts with classes. It is as if mathematicians would start with axioms. You do not start with axioms - you start with proofs. Only when you have found a bunch of related proofs, can you come up with axioms. You end with axioms. The same thing is true in programming: you have to start with interesting algorithms. Only when you understand them well, can you come up with an interface that will let them work.
Quotes to Explore
-
The charms of women were never more powerful never inspired such achievements, as in those immortal periods, when they could neither read nor write.
-
I still dwelled deep in my elected paradise--a paradise whose skies were the color of hell-flames--but still a paradise.
-
I have no intention of coaching Boca Juniors, and no-one from the club has approached me to do so.
-
We fight like we're a married couple.
-
Every single song that I've listened to is in my memory forever.
-
Fame or integrity: which is more important? Money or happiness: which is more valuable? Success or failure: which is more destructive? If you look to others for fulfillment, you will never truly be fulfilled. If your happiness depends on money, you will never be happy with yourself. Be content with what you have; rejoice in the way things are. When you realize there is nothing lacking, the whole world belongs to you.
-
Virtue hath no tongue to check vice's pride.
-
I think all happiness depends on the energy to assume the mask of some other life, on a re-birth as something not one's self.
-
I don't have rights. Let's put it this way: in athletics, I don't have rights.
-
Give me the benefit of your assistance during those ablutions that neccessarily, though unfortunatly, invariably follow the excercise of the culinary art.
-
All proofs rest on premises.
-
Complexity assertions have to be part of the interface.
-
As more and more good ideas come under the protection of patents, it may become increasingly unlikely that any one program can incorporate the state of the art in user-interface design without sinking into a quagmire of unending royalty payments and legal battles.
-
The only power you have is the word no.
-
I find OOP methodologically wrong. It starts with classes. It is as if mathematicians would start with axioms. You do not start with axioms - you start with proofs. Only when you have found a bunch of related proofs, can you come up with axioms. You end with axioms. The same thing is true in programming: you have to start with interesting algorithms. Only when you understand them well, can you come up with an interface that will let them work.
