-
Perl has a long tradition of working around compilers.
-
Odd that we think definitions are definitive.
-
> (It's sorta like sed, but not. It's sorta like awk, but not. etc.)Guilty as charged. Perl is happily ugly, and happily derivative.
-
: Why Bible quotes exclusively? What happened to the Eastern religions?<BR>I'm still working on the Unicode mods.
-
The only disadvantage I see is that it would force everyone to get Perl. Horrors.
-
Anyway, there's plenty of room for doubt. It might seem easy enough, but computer language design is just like a stroll in the park.Jurassic Park, that is.
-
There are probably better ways to do that, but it would make the parser more complex. I do, occasionally, struggle feebly against complexity...
-
It should be illegal to yell 'Y2K' in a crowded economy.
-
Call me bored, but don't call me boring.
-
In general, if you think something isn't in Perl, try it out, because it usually is.
-
Sometimes we choose the generalization. Sometimes we don't.
-
I wouldn't ever write the full sentence myself, but then, I never use goto either.
-
The following two statements are usually both true: There's not enough documentation. There's too much documentation.
-
…I also discovered Larry's First Law of Language Redesign: Everyone wants the colon.
-
As pointed out in a followup, Real Perl Programmers prefer things to be visually distinct.
-
I was trying not to mention backtracking. Which, of course, means that yours is 'righter' than mine, in a theoretical sense.
-
: - cut in regexpsI don't think we reached consensus on that. We're still backtracking...
-
Historically Tcl has always stored all intermediate results as strings. (With 8.0 they're rethinking that. Of course, Perl rethought that from the start.)
-
Dan Smith: I've tried (in vi) 'g/[a-z]\n[a-z]/s//_/'...but that doesn't cut it. Any ideas? (I take it that it may be a two-pass sort of solution).Larry Wall: In the first pass, install perl.
-
... an initial underscore already conveys strong feelings of magicalness to a C programmer.
-
I don't like this official/unofficial distinction. It sound, er, officious.
-
Randal said it would be tough to do in sed. He didn't say he didn't understand sed. Randal understands sed quite well. Which is why he uses Perl.
-
I'm sure a mathematician would claim that 0 and 1 are both very interesting numbers.
-
There are many times when you want it to ignore the rest of the string just like atof() does. Oddly enough, Perl calls atof(). How convenient.